Multi-Agent Logics, Languages, and Organisations
Federated Workshops

COST AT Argumentation day, September 10 and 11
At MALLOW in Torino on Thursday September 10 and Friday September 11 an event on new ideas in argumentation will be held.

The event will be supported by COST Agreement Technologies (Action IC0801).

The topic of the day will be new directions in argumentation, such as temporal dynamics, fibring of argumentation frameworks, modal logics of argumentation, modal provability foundations for argumentation, etc.

The day will start with the MALLOW plenary session invited speaker Prof. Dov Gabbay

Program:

Thu 10 September
9.15-10.45
Plenary session invited talk

Dov Gabbay, King's college, Bar-Ilan University and University of Luxembourg: new metalevel ideas for argumentation networks: fibring, translations, new modes of attacks, higher level semantics and more

14.15-15.45

Artur d'Avila Garcez, City University London Argumentation neural networks
Martin Caminada, University of Luxembourg: Semi-stable semantics
Yining Wu, University of Luxembourg: Argumentation Semantics versus Logic Programming Semantics

16.15-18.15

Fabio Paglieri, ISTC CNR Why arguing? Towards a cost-benefit analysis of argumentation
Nino Rotolo, University of Bologna: Argumentation semantics for Temporal Defeasible Logic
Discussion

Fri 11 September
9.15-10.45

Leendert van der Torre, University of Luxembourg: Five new ideas about argumentation
Serena Villata, University of Torino: A flattening algorithm for meta-argumentation
Discussion

11-15-12.45

Leila Amgoud, IRIT: On the limits of Dung's abstract argumentation framework
Piero Baroni and Massimiliano Giacomin, University of Brescia Abstract argumentation semantics: from principles to design Slides
Discussion

The session is open for all members of COST AT and all MALLOW participants

Organizers:
Guido Boella and Leendert van der Torre

Prof. Dov Gabbay will present in his invited talk his latest work on argumentation, illustrated by the following articles:

Temporal Dynamics of Support and Attack Networks: From Argumentation to Zoology H. Barringer, D. Gabbay and J. Woods

Fibring Argumentation Frames D. Gabbay

Logical Modes of Attack in Argumentation Networks D. Gabbay and A. d’Avila Garcez

Modal Provability Foundations for Argumentation Networks D. Gabbay

Semantics for Higher Level Attacks in Extended Argumentation Frames D. Gabbay

Other material for the discussion:

Value-based Argumentation Frameworks as Neural-Symbolic Learning Systems D. Gabbay, A. S. d’Avila Garcez and L. Lamb

Why arguing? Towards a cost-benefit analysis of argumentation Fabio Paglieri and Cristiano Castelfranchi

Semi-stable semantics Martin Caminada and Paul Dunne